Sunday, September 26, 2010

You can have a growth spurt at 23 - I did...!!

Yes your feet do expand when you stop doing pointe work. Well...that is true in my case. I have stopped doing pointe work twice in my time. The first time I stopped for a while when I was 16 and found that my toes became softer but the marks from my calluses never really disappeared. The second time is now - which is for good. I can't see myself wearing those "pointing boots" ever again really...although, I would like to maybe for one more jaunt. My feet have expanded a whole size since stopping pointe work. I haven't dance en pointe for hmm...nearly 3 months now and I have gone from a very inconvenient ladies size 6/6.5 to a 7. I discovered this when I went shoe shopping a month ago....telling all the shop ladies, no I'm someone who sits between 6 and 6.5....when no really....I had expanded to a new digit entirely. Not a negative discovery at all. It just means that now that my toes don't have to bare the weight of my entire body they have room to lengthen now. I still have marks on my toes from where my calluses were and my bunions still exist... I don't have dainty "lady's feet" and I never will. In a sense though, I kinda like having scrunchy dancer's toes. It's a mark of my former life.

....what certainly isn't a mark of my former life is my ever expanding waistline....

....that's another story altogether!!!

Alessandra Ferri's beautiful legs....how I wish I had those pins!

Saturday, September 25, 2010

Ridley's Robin....a run down....

I am going to open with a potentially blasphemous comment...

....Kevin Costner's Robin Hood was much better than Russell Crowe's.





There I said it.




The English will be scrunching their fists at the mere thought that an American Robin Hood pulled it off with far better charisma (albeit with a very wrong accent) compared to their Commonwealth Aussie. But there's more to it than that. I watched Ridley Scott's version of the tale with the awareness that yes, I could potentially be disappointed as it had very mixed reviews. Some loved it - others hated it. I can see why.


A summary of why Ridley's Robin didn't do it for me is as follows:


  • I did not like the way in which the character of "Robin Hood" was set up in this film to be Robin Longstride masquerading as Robert Loxley.
  • I did not like the fact that the Sheriff of Nottingham was all but written out of the film's plot and appeared as a bumbling buffoon in most of his scenes (sorry Matt MacFayden - I loved you in Death at a Funeral, but you were no good as the Sheriff - and no wonder because you were given next to nothing to work with)!!!
  • Though it was interesting to have Richard the Lionheart drop dead at the beginning, it made me question where the happy ending was going to come from seeing as though in past renditions of this story, Richard returns safely and order is restored. The fact that the end sequence sets up Robin to be an outlaw opens the film up for a sequel - which if it does happen, I will most definitely not be seeing it.
  • I disliked the fact that Sir Godfrey was given such a big part in the story as the "bad guy" because it took away from the old adage that Prince John was the whiny monarch that carried out all the orders - in this version, he fought along side Robin in the end battle. I preferred Costner's Robin storyline to which Godfrey was the evil henchman of the Sheriff.
  • I did not like how they made Lady Marian a sword wielding woman of business. I wanted her to be a little bit more feminine. A bit of spirit is good, but this Marian was too masculine and when she snuck into the end battle scene it obliterated any respect I had for this character (and Ridley Scott) - clear indication that the writers "sold out" to the popular blockbuster recipe, rather than staying true to themselves. It was a little bit reminiscent of what they did with Kiera Knightly's character in the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise. I preferred the feminine characterization of Marian portrayed by the very elegant Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio (Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves - 1991).
Robin Hood - Prince of Thieves (1991)

  • Although I love Cate Blanchett and love her work - and truly believe that she is such a talented force, I thought she was miscast as Marian. I had to "get used" to seeing her in that role. Which really...should never be the case if you are watching a film. The actor shouldn't be present. On screen it should just be the character and nothing else. Sadly I had to "grow to like" her in that role and that just spoiled it for me. Nothing wrong with her acting as she was fantastic as per usual, but I thought she just didn't suit that role. I also felt she was too masculine. I would have rather seen Rachel Weisz as Marian.
  • It is clear that what Ridley tried to do here with Russell was try and make another Gladiator. I loved that film. Gladiator was and still is, in my opinion a great film. However....Robin Hood, is not. Russell was too old and haggard looking for my idea of what Robin should look like and I didn't like his accent. I couldn't stand him as Robin. It just didn't do it for me. To the point where - if you scroll back to my first comment - I prefer Kevin Costner's portrayal of the outlaw. Even with that stupid American accent. So that is saying something! Russell was in no way appealing, charismatic or remotely charming. He was great in all the battle scenes, but I felt there was too much war and not enough coverage of what Robin was really about. The folk stories did not tout him to be a soldier. Yes he fought when he had to, but he was known as a keen archer, a ladies man and also - he robbed from the rich to give to the poor - not ONCE did we see that happen in this version.
  • I would have rather had seen Sam Worthington in that role, or (interestingly) Christian Bale - who was one of the top three actors considered for the part....
  • ....oh and finally!!!! There was absolutely NO chemistry between Russell and Cate. It would've been nice to have felt something when Robin and Lady Marian were falling in love but I got nothing. Once again...Kevin and Mary had way more power together in the 1991 version. Russ and Cate did not even look right together.......

Ridley Scott is a fantastic director there is no doubt about that, but I felt that he missed the mark with this one. The cinematography was fantastic as usual and he was able to present (as usual) some fantastic action scenes.  However, it was no Gladiator. Gladiator had all the right things and the most important element which makes a film so great is its story. Without a strong story you have nothing.


Score = 4.5/10


Sunday, September 19, 2010

2 flops and an, "is that it?!"

Love DVD night. Lately DVD night has extended to full day sessions where I get all my tasks done in the morning so that all afternoon throughout till the evening all I have to do is veg out on the couch and immerse myself in a film, or two, or three. This weekend's selection was plucked from the week's new releases and boy oh boy....hurry up and release the good films because this selection was a bit naff. 


In a nutshell:


  • "From Paris With Love" ~ action film with John Travolta I believed might be worth seeing was an incredible flop...just awful....
  • "The Other Man" ~ considered watching Liam Neeson potentially murder his wife's toy boy looked prospective....turned out to be quite dull...
  • "New York, I love you" ~ HEAVILY ANTICIPATED because I LOVED "Paris, J'taime"....it's American counterpart was good, however something was lacking....


Overall evaluation for this weekend's flicks: Poor....

I do dislike get disappointed over films and lately I feel like Hollywood has been churning out a lot of crap. It's like a game of minesweeper trying to weave out which one's are winners and which one's will be sure to disappoint. Sometimes you can just outright tell from the cover of the DVD, the title, the blurb on the back giving insight into the theme of the film and sometimes even the ensemble cast...sorry Lohan - anything you are in is ultimately blacklisted. 

Why didn't Travolta's butt-kicking do it for me this time? It's funny because all rave reviews I heard about this came from men....typical. What's not there to like? Travolta shoots a bunch of baddies whilst trying to save the world and there are hot women included, with some "catchy" one-liners?! Sorry....1 & 1/2 hours of watching our former Disco-King slaughter people gets boring after about fifteen minutes, the women whilst gorgeous did not really serve much of a purpose in the film - except for the protagonist's love interest who had a very odd character shift towards the end of the film....it really didn't gel with me and the one-liners...god awful. I can't stand needless dialogue. I can't stand it when needless dialogue is bad. Probably why I "tolerate"  Quinton Tarentino's films rather than fully enjoy them - he is notorious for extended dialogue...which more often than not does not lead anywhere. "From Paris With Love" was also a dreadful title for a dreadful film. What a disappointment....

Travolta means business...again...

....and the disappointment only continued when I watched Liam Neeson chase after and then manipulate his dead wife's toy boy....who turned out to be Antonio Banderes. I did like Banderes' character not being completely what he seemed - I won't give it away because those that would like to see this will be irritated that I divulged a major plot point. I enjoyed both actor's performances - they were great as per usual. However...the story line was quite drab. The beginning was exciting where the wife suddenly disappears and no explanation is given so one is quick to assume that she has run off with her other man. But the beginning gets dragged on and it just becomes more of the same. The revelation that the wife is in fact dead broke things up...but the relationship between both men in her life was quite bizarre and I truly believe that if this had happened in real life...that is not how it would have played out. The ending was anti-climatic...without any real resolution and with a strange notion that all of Liam's character's internal conflicts just spontaneously evaporates. What a disappointment...

Ethan being our familiar Ethan...
"New York, I Love You" - the unofficial sequel to it's Parisian predecessor was great. I loved all the miniature story lines that intertwined and I loved all the actors used. It was quite warming seeing our Ethan Hawke play a very familiar character once again - instead of his usual conflicted drug-addict/corrupt cop which he has been playing a lot recently. It was a warm reminder of why all the women fell in love with him almost two decades ago! Natalie Portman's directorial debut was wonderful in that she presented a father-daughter story with the one and only Carlos Acosta - who was spectacular for the brief ten minutes he was on screen. For those that do not know, Mr. Acosta is a superstar in the ballet world and that man can dance - he has proved he can also act. Kudos! The whole package was sweet and bubbly and had glimpses of what we felt and experienced when we watched "Paris, J'taime" - but it was definitely NO "Paris, J'taime"....sadly....I felt some of the stories that occurred at the beginning of the film were not resolved completely and that there was not enough love. There was love there....there were some butterfly inducing parts where characters flirtatiously exchanged dialogue, but there was no follow through. It was like all fore-play and no sex (to be blunt). That is what let me down for this film. When the credits began to roll I honestly said to myself... "is that it?!" I was expecting more. Sadly....I only got my entrée and part of my main-course....no dessert here. Sad because this could have been excellent...but I settle with saying just great and maybe only a little good.

Ms. Portman with her director's hat

So....I still have one more film (that was so kindly sent to me because I'd had no hope of finding it here) - a Jared Leto flick that looks like a different take on Brad Pitt's Benjamine Button....although without the aging backwards. From what I've seen of the trailer it does involve time-jumping. So should be quite interesting. Oh yes...hehehe...it's called "Mr. Nobody". I do hope that this one doesn't disappoint....maybe I shouldn't have such high expectations to begin with???

J x

Saturday, September 11, 2010

Gallery Fifty Four

An interview with

Katherine Alexandra Brunacci


I have had the pleasure knowing this creative lady since our days at high school. A creative soul, she has launched her own jewellery collection (KAB & FF) as well as opened her own gallery featuring exclusively hand-made Tasmanian fine jewellery. "Gallery Fifty Four" is her baby.

 Katherine took the time to discuss with me her collection, her gallery and her artistic routes. I extend my sincerest thanks for her participation in this interview.

*****

At school, I had always known you to be a very creative individual who was heavily into performing arts and at the time that I met you, you seemed to be very driven towards making a career in drama. I had always known you as the actress that would someday go to NIDA and possibly become our own Cate Blanchet. What I didn’t know about you was that you were also extremely creative artistically. Did you always know that you had a flare for the arts or was it something you discovered at school?
               It was probably something I discovered at school. From an early age I loved to act ( I was a bit of a drama queen) and create things using my hands. I found that with the stress of school I could relax and let loose in drama class and go into my own little world in art classes. I didn’t know at that stage or even now weather I had a flare for the arts it was just something I could find solace in and really loved doing. I’m just really lucky that people enjoy and appreciate my work and that I love doing it.


 Why did you choose jewellery and how did you select which school to further your education in this field?
               People ask my this all the time. I’m really not sure how I got interested in jewellery. I think it might of started with a beading kit for a 13thbirthday and then escalated in a major way from there. I always loved the fine arts and fashion, I think for me jewellery was a  coupling these passions. 
In my final years of high school I enrolled in a TAFE jewellery diploma, which cemented my love for the craft. 
I chose RMIT University manly because of its reputation as one of the best gold and Silversmithing School in the country. (I was just lucky that they chose me).


 How would you describe your style?
                I am intrigued and inspired by jewellery design from the past, at the moment I’m particularly interested in byzantine, art nouveau and art deco era’s.  research and apply technical and aesthetic aspects from such examples of historical jewellery in combination with modern techniques. 
My aim is that traditional examples of jewellery are reinterpreted and modernized in an attempt to reflect the generation of today.


 A mutual friend of ours led me to your gallery in Launceston and I was just in complete awe when I stepped into this elegant room. How did Gallery Fifty Four come into being?
                 During my final year of my Masters I had to decide what I wanted to do once I had finished. There were three options; further study, stay in Melbourne and get stocked in some of the boutiques there or move home to Tasmania and try my luck.  In the end everything in Tasmania just fell into place. The location became available along with a studio. I liked the idea that I had control the environment my work was being exhibited in, and that I could support fellow jewellers in Tasmania in exhibiting there work. I also wanted to bring some of the contemporary jewellery seen to my hometown, which is so active in Melbourne. Gallery Fifty Four is the first only contemporary jewellery gallery in Tasmania. All the works are hand crafted and are in limited production, which means all clients purchase a unique piece of jewellery, which may never be made again.


Where did this concept of a gallery come from as opposed to a boutique?
               I see the Gallery as both boutique and gallery. There are items, which really cater for the fashion market, still wearable but an individual statement and others, which are wearable artworks, only two be worn on the most spectacular occasions.


How did you come to meet the other jewellers and did you have a hand at which pieces would be displayed?
  I met the other Jewellers mainly through study, the other local jewellery is a family friend. I chose not to have a hand in what pieces they wanted to exhibit. I already had a pretty good idea about what there style was like. I also wanted as much variety as possible, which has been achieved mainly through there freedom. Gallery Fifty Four show cases a variety of works ranging in styles and material from Mel Millers vibrant felt works to Caitlin Dougherty’s whimsical nest rings and vintage watch face pieces.


Do you see yourself expanding your business and possibly opening another gallery in Hobart?
                I would love to expand the business and it is definitely in the pipelines. I would keep the Launceston location as the exclusive Tasmanian concept store. My dream is to open a boutique in either Sydney or Melbourne and maybe have an international presence in Europe. (A girl can dream)

 Will you be working towards having your pieces showcased at fashion festivals and possibly launching your own commercial brand?
                Most defiantly I already have two commercial brands, the FF and KAB collections that, are sold exclusively through the gallery and online. These lines are going to be showcased in a few exciting fashion projects later this year. I would love to do some collaboration with fashion houses. Exploring different textures, materials and ideas of wear ability. I really do believe that fashion and jewellery go hand in hand with one another.


 What is your advice for young women or men who are looking to break into this field?

               Firstly get some basic skills by learning from someone who has experience in the field, either through study or an apprenticeship. One thing that I have learnt though, is that everyone has there own way of doing technical jobs, when you find a way that works well for yourself stick with it even if you have discovered it yourself. There are no wrong ways of doing things in the trade just different. 
              Read as many technical books as you can get your hands on. 
Enter as many contemporary jewellery competitions as possible. This helps to get your name known in the industry.



            And finally practice, practice, practice.  Some skills can be a little tricky and you often think to yourself your never going to master them, but eventually everything just falls into place and the next thing you know your teaching someone else how its done.












Gallery Fifty Four Contemporary Jewellery Gallery
50-54 St John St Launceston Tas
PO BOX 672 Launceston Tas 7250
PH - 0427-0990-029
EMAIL - galleryfiftyfour@gmail.com




Monday, September 6, 2010

Interval shots & sushi train ~

I spent a lovely long weekend in Melbourne - my favourite city.

Here are some shots taken during the interval of "West Side Story" (which was fabulous) at the glorious Regent Theatre...









...amongst other things I was a virgin of the sushi train! Ticked that one off my list....



....and the demolition......with my sister!



...a couple of the many things I did whilst away for the weekend. Special mention to two lovely ladies that were beyond a bundle of fun to be with - Hayley and Rebecca - pictures and full report may follow in a few days! 

J x

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Tutu's, sequins, glitter and hairspray - lots and lots of hairspray!

I once drove home in full costume and make-up with my pointe shoes still on, firmly tucked in my sneakers to which I hadn’t even bothered to tie the laces and only a jacket covering my upper half. Why? A brief moment of psychosis where I completely forgot that I had in fact already given my teacher my music for my solo – thinking that I had left the tape at home instead. I wasn’t zapped with the memory of handing it over to her until I got into my house and then by then I was swearing with frustration because the prime parking spot I had claimed at the theatre could well have disappeared by the time I got back. Luckily – I reclaimed my car park, unluckily – my neighbours and street witnessed a bizarre woman entering and exiting my home without shutting or locking the door behind her and driving off wearing what appeared to be a puffy gypsy costume and drag-queen make-up.

Performing in a group was always fun ~ a golden oldie circa 2002
(I was the one second to the left)
 Oh! – the excitement and madness that is the eisteddfods, where students get over-excited, parents lose their minds and teachers go a little bit more grey. That episode I described occurred during the time that I was both teaching and dancing, so not only had I the responsibility to put myself on, but I had all these girls I had to tend to as well. That particular evening I had four kids to put on stage as well as myself. So I guess I can be forgiven for having that lapse in memory and reacting like a loony when I experienced unnecessary shock. Needless to say, it makes a great stage story and it never fails to make me giggle. I write this with the Launceston Festival of Dance in mind, as some of my girls will be preparing to hit the stage in the coming week and they will be sure to have pre-performance nerves coupled with excitement.

As a kid, eisteddfods were great fun and I loved performing in groups. I didn’t begin my first solo until I was 11 and in a way I am so glad I wasn’t thrust on stage alone in my nappies like some of my friends were. At least I had some time to watch my peers who were already performing solos and to observe how everyone else prepared. For a time as a teenager I became really competitive and I believe I did have a few unglamorous moments (mostly at home or backstage where no one could see me and when I was very alone)  - mostly spurred on by feelings of inadequacy and disappointment that I didn’t execute those pirouettes on stage that I had been able to perform at the studio without too many issues. In general however, I had adopted the mentality that the eisteddfod was just another opportunity to get on stage. Whilst the trophies and medals were icing on the cake and a welcomed reward for hard work, I wasn’t overly concerned like some other girls about winning. I can count on one hand how many times I was overly concerned with winning – and I’m glad it’s just one hand.

My last championship
Competition isn’t a bad thing and I think children need to experience a bit of that whilst they are growing up because there is a lot of it out there in the “real world” in many different forms. Healthy competition is especially beneficial as (usually) it gives a child perspective on their abilities but also a bit of motivation to rise to the challenge. It’s a great form of character building. There is however, it’s ugly twin-sister, unhealthy competition albeit the cutthroat nasty side that does in an eisteddfod atmosphere rear its head from time to time. I remember a long time ago when competing for groups my fellow peers and I would make an effort to stay away from one particular dance school because their girls had a reputation for not being all that forthcoming, or friendly to say the least. Bitching and backstabbing between schools and sometimes between dancers representing the same school was not uncommon and I believe it probably still happens today in varying degrees. At the end of the day poor behaviour like this is a product of one of two things (or sometimes both): ignorance – a lack of knowledge, understanding or empathy of the other party and/or jealousy – formed from personal insecurities. I remember the only times I ever became consumed with winning came out of the primal need to dismiss my insecurities and to prove myself, to assert myself on stage and publicly. I wanted to show that “Jacquelyne France” was here! Most of my negative feelings were self-centred and whilst I did experience jealousy of my peers it was because I felt inadequate and I wanted to do what they could do, or exude the confidence they had. I am still to this day an insecure and anxious person. I was particularly insecure about my abilities as a dancer and I don’t think I’d be alone with that statement – no matter how technically proficient, artistically attuned or physically gifted a dancer may be, they will always be insecure about one or more aspects of themselves and their abilities as a dancer. Sylvie Guillem who is GOD would have insecurities and I am confident with that assumption because she is despite being a physically and artistically gifted dancer - is still a human being (even though we’d like to think she is an alien sent to earth just to perform on stage). Feelings of insecurity and inadequacy, I think stems from the fact that dancing is an art-form that strives for perfection and no human can be perfect. That was my major attraction to ballet, the fact that it was an art that was built on the premise of looking ethereal and not of this world – something that was beyond an ordinary human.

The incomparable Sylvie Guillem
Nevertheless, the older I got, the less and less I became so concerned with the “rewards”. I think being 19, 20, 21, 22, I had already achieved what I needed to achieve at a local eisteddfod so it became less about proving and asserting myself and more about feeding that addiction of being on stage. A three-minute solo was my performance. An eisteddfod became a week long Gala instead of a competition. By that time I had students to be responsible for and so a performance on stage became a miniature dedication to my kids, to show them what their teacher was capable of and to show them that they can do that too with a lot of hard work and discipline. I remember sharing the stage with my teacher and watching her dance, that feeling was truly incredible and served as inspiration. It is an indescribable feeling watching someone you admire and look up to performing on stage in front of you. I hoped that my kids would share that wonderful experience that I had when I saw my teacher dance, because despite all the glitter, hairspray and eyelashes that comes with eisteddfods, they are also a place of inspiration. You will see some amazing performances and some very talented kids – sometimes you see some very talented adults. It was always a place where I could renew that motivation and to fuel that drive to work. Sometimes the positive aspects of eisteddfods gets lost on some people and it just becomes all about that prize, which really...whilst yes there is nothing wrong with striving to be the best on the day, there is more to that experience than just a gold medal. I feel that if you are unable to see beyond just that superficial side, then you are missing out entirely on a whole other dimension – and that is sad.

I will forever cherish my time participating in the world of the eisteddfod and well, maybe one day I’ll be back, if not as a teacher or a dancer, but as a mother. Having gone through that world and come out the other end okay (I think I’ve done okay) I believe I’m equipped with the knowledge and experience that may be helpful for my daughter/son/student if they choose to enter this world too, because it can be a whole lot of fun – especially if drag queen make-up and lots of sequins are involved!

As a kid with a whole lotta drag-queen make-up!